Reflection essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 3

Reflection - Essay ExampleThe State presented the second charge on grounds that it was in general unexclusive interest that Bell be kept behind bars. The State supported their information that Bell had been convicted of First degree robbery, Third degree robbery, and possession of narcotics with the spirit of selling them (STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. ARNOLD BELL, 2011). The State also presented information that Bell was released on supervision from Court when he was charged with the murder of Fumiati.So, the endeavor court hear the case for the second charge whether the history of Bell conducted was of nature that he should be kept behind bars for an extended period (STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. ARNOLD BELL, 2011). The trial court decided that it would be of best interest that Bell be kept behind bars for an extended period under 53a-35a.Bell appealed to this finish of the court claiming that it had violated his basic constitutional rights and that it was under the jury to decide whether to prolong the sentence rather than the trial court. The court agreed to Bells claim that it was then unconstitutional and remanded the second part of the case for a new-made hearing. The remand trial was unsuccessful as the jury failed to come up to a unanimous verdict, so a new trial was ordered. Bell asked for the second charge to be lifted on grounds that it was unconstitutional. On the new trial, both parties presented their justifications however, the jury concluded that there was sufficient evidence that Bell was guilty of abhorrence and should serve a prolong sentence in mess of public interest i.e. forty years imprisonment.The cases decision on the first part i.e. the defendant was found guilty of murder and crime was justified as sufficient evidence was provided by the State on the matter. The trial courts decision on the second part was indeed unconstitutional, and it needed the consent of the jury to prolong